Startseite
Forum
Fragen
Suchen
Formeleditor
Über Uns
Registrieren
Login
FAQ
Suchen
Foren-Übersicht
->
Sonstiges
Antwort schreiben
Benutzername
(du bist
nicht
eingeloggt!)
Titel
Nachrichtentext
Smilies
Weitere Smilies ansehen
Schriftfarbe:
Standard
Dunkelrot
Rot
Orange
Braun
Gelb
Grün
Oliv
Cyan
Blau
Dunkelblau
Indigo
Violett
Weiß
Schwarz
Schriftgröße:
Schriftgröße
Winzig
Klein
Normal
Groß
Riesig
Tags schließen
Schreibt eure Formeln hier im Board am besten mit Latex!
So gehts:
Latex-Kurzbeschreibung
|
Formeleditor
[quote="Neko"]Die besten Dinger sind: [i]If the theory of gravity were true, it would show that the sun's gravitational force on the moon is much stronger than the earth's gravitational force on the moon, so the moon would go around the sun[/i] und dann: [i]The existence of tides is often taken as a proof of gravity, but this is logically flawed. Because if the moon's “gravity” were responsible for a bulge underneath it, then how can anyone explain a high tide on the opposite side of the earth at the same time? Anyone can observe that there are 2 -- not 1 -- high tides every day. It is far more likely that tides were given us by an Intelligent Creator long ago and they have been with us ever since. In any case, two high tides falsifies gravity.[/i] :lolhammer: Ja genau, und wenn ich mit dem Baden fertig bin, dann fließt das Wasser auch ins nichts :D [i]There are numerous other flaws. For example, astronomers, who seem to have a fetish for gravity, tell us that the moon rotates on its axis but at the same time it always presents the same face to the earth. This is patently absurd.[/i] No it isnt Ellery, its called Bound Gravitation. ;) [i]Furthermore, gravity theory suggests that the planets have been moving in orderly orbits for millions and millions of years, which wholly contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics.[/i] Als Physiker sollte man wissen, wann man ein system mechanisch und wann thermodynamisch beschreiben kann ->Relaxationszeit Oh man, ich hab noch nie so einen Mist gelesen. Danke für den Link, er hat mich sehr ehrheitert :wink:[/quote]
Optionen
HTML ist
aus
BBCode
ist
an
Smilies sind
an
BBCode in diesem Beitrag deaktivieren
Smilies in diesem Beitrag deaktivieren
Spamschutz
Text aus Bild eingeben
Alle Zeiten sind GMT + 1 Stunde
Gehe zu:
Forum auswählen
Themenbereiche
----------------
Mechanik
Elektrik
Quantenphysik
Astronomie
Wärmelehre
Optik
Sonstiges
FAQ
Sonstiges
----------------
Off-Topic
Ankündigungen
Thema-Überblick
Autor
Nachricht
Neko
Verfasst am: 05. Dez 2005 07:34
Titel:
Die besten Dinger sind:
If the theory of gravity were true, it would show that the sun's gravitational force on the moon is much stronger than the earth's gravitational force on the moon, so the moon would go around the sun
und dann:
The existence of tides is often taken as a proof of gravity, but this is logically flawed. Because if the moon's “gravity” were responsible for a bulge underneath it, then how can anyone explain a high tide on the opposite side of the earth at the same time? Anyone can observe that there are 2 -- not 1 -- high tides every day. It is far more likely that tides were given us by an Intelligent Creator long ago and they have been with us ever since. In any case, two high tides falsifies gravity.
Ja genau, und wenn ich mit dem Baden fertig bin, dann fließt das Wasser auch ins nichts
There are numerous other flaws. For example, astronomers, who seem to have a fetish for gravity, tell us that the moon rotates on its axis but at the same time it always presents the same face to the earth. This is patently absurd.
No it isnt Ellery, its called Bound Gravitation.
Furthermore, gravity theory suggests that the planets have been moving in orderly orbits for millions and millions of years, which wholly contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Als Physiker sollte man wissen, wann man ein system mechanisch und wann thermodynamisch beschreiben kann ->Relaxationszeit
Oh man, ich hab noch nie so einen Mist gelesen. Danke für den Link, er hat mich sehr ehrheitert
guesto
Verfasst am: 05. Dez 2005 02:47
Titel: das muss man sich mal reinziehen...
http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/p67.htm